Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
Chat with KlaraComing Soon
OpenGov
View All Medium Spender

Patron Milestones 2-7 Development

inMedium Spender
2 years ago
infrastructure
opensource
Rejected

Patron is a tool to verify & build smart-contracts in one step. Smart contract verification is crucial for ensuring the security, reliability, and trust-worthiness of dApps and blockchain platforms. With Patron, you can simplify the deployment flow and help make the Polkadot ecosystem more secure.

In this proposal we are describing the next Patron milestones.
In general, we’d like to unite all the work in this roadmap in next main points:

  • Utilizing Parity’s verification image on a server in an isolated manner to ensure server safety of both our and self-hosted environments
  • Implementing a new subcommand, which automatically checks server code hash against the local build code hash using the local source code
  • Implementing the Caller UI
  • Implementing local build capabilities that don’t use Docker, to improve user flow for contract testing cases, where quick builds are required
  • ink! Code analyzer integration

The team behind this product is Brushfam, led by professionals such as Markian Ivanichok and Green Baneling who are behind PSP22, PSP34, and PSP37 standards creation, major impact on how ink! works, creation of such infrastructure products for ink! smart contract ecosystem as Sol2Ink, Typechain and OpenBrush itself.

Full Proposal

For more information on our proposal, including a detailed roadmap, please see the following link:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WJ0AOENiczHxw2iFpbw3SxHU56OXDzIL8n4uifIwbKk/edit?usp=sharing

Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your support!

Comments (5)

2 years ago

Hello there!

Your proposal will be discussed next week on the first episode of Citizen Auditors!

We're a group of stakeholders wanting to make DotSama more fun, accessible and transparent.

If you want to promote your proposal, please join us next Monday at 14:30 UTC time.
join.dot.foundation

profile
alantropova
2 years ago

@.foundation Hello!

We have already attended your meeting, and everyone can see it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvNQ7oROCNg

2 years ago

ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.

  1. Some members raised concerns that we can't find your original milestone 1 to track it's success.
  2. Some members wanted to see metrics of how often your tools are being used, and how many users are using them, including their adoption on Aleph Zero, Astar and Phala.
  3. Some members pointed out that early development was funded by Aleph Zero, and wondered why Aleph Zero isn't continuing to fund this.
  4. Some members raised a discussion around the frequency of referenda from Brushfam/727 Ventures, saying specifically that it is hard to keep track as to what has been paid out so far.
  5. Some members expressed concerns about how many tools Brushfam/727 Ventures is working on and wondered how often developers are splitting time between multiple Treasury-funded products and what is the larger roadmap.
  6. Some members requested to see more reports and metrics about Brushfam/727 Ventures' previously funded tools. Doubts were raised about their adoption and utility.
  7. There were some concerns about the cost breakdown - for example there is no breakdown as to the hourly rate of team members working on this proposal.
  8. Some members asked whether or not Brushfam/727 Ventures have any plans to make their business model more sustainable in the future or if the plan is to rely solely on the treasury.
  9. Several members strongly recommended that Brushfam/727 Ventures provide a concise, non-technical summary at the start of their referendums' contextual information so that non technical voters are able to easily understand the context of the the proposal.

ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required provide any feedback as to why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect the right to anonymity of our members, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to provide feedback.

profile
alantropova
2 years ago

@ChaosDAO Hello dear ChaosDAO community!
Thank you for providing a feedback, this is really important for us.

Here we attach a link to a document where our team prepared detailed answers to each of your concerns.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KFh-CYiLY4Av_fSj2MdukjcsKJn64KfCkmSRhbtBZHc/edit?usp=sharing 

We believe that this will help you to have a clear picture and to have your support for our proposal.

Thank you!

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

DOT
18.39K DOT

Proposal Failed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (101)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (41)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy