We should have a separate security collective. I don't think anyone would disagree security is important. Why include that in the ambassador program? IMO, PAL is perfectly suited to become this general purpose security collective that encompasses many different activities. In the future I could see it turning into a collective with a treasury for expenses along with salaries for members. What is the issue with PAL? The mission scope needs to be expanded and you need to change the payment from % of payouts, to a salary. Just put in a proposal to do that and to expand its mission. Viola, security proto-collective using a bounty. Operate under that bounty until you've organized and can get a new collective for security approved on-chain. I have explained exactly this to another PAL curator that wanted to do exactly what you're suggesting here.

We feel partial to the proposed Cybersecurity push push for Polkadot as we think it's one of the things that can guarantee soundly the trust of dapps and users within the blockchain ecosystems (we've seen previously how cyber was used purposely as a means for damage, mostly in the EVM ecosystems). So a cyber bounty/collective could make sense given the right framework. We have additional questions about different topics. So can we get an approximate FTE that you are gonna use for the work as HA? Is there a team behind you? if so who are they? Who will they be? Will you gonna focus on a particular geographical location for your efforts as HA or will the efforts will be mostly remote? Are there already companies and / or projects willing to embark into this cyber push within Polkadot? Thank you in advance.