Dear @14p5...kg3N ,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is nay due to missing context. Please provide details so that the community can properly evaluate it, and feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort V Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

🏛️ REEEEEEEEEE DAO

REEEEEEEEEE DAO is a decentralized collective body committed to serve Polkadot Opengov. Our mission is to provide high-quality assessments on referenda to ensure outcomes that strengthen the Polkadot ecosystem. Each referendum is reviewed carefully by our DAO members through the scope of technical, strategic, and governance.

📋 Community Feedback

In principle, we see these types of projects as generally beneficial. However, in this particular case, we would recommend the team to first pursue the DeFi Infra & Tooling bounty rather than the OG track.
We also note that the team has already received grants from Valocity Labs & Co., which led to the impression that they would have direct support from them in potentially securing funds through the DeFi Infra bounty.
Additionally, the proposed Stage 2 on advanced governance and staking analysis appears redundant and unnecessary. There is already at least one staking dashboard funded by the Treasury, and several DVs and community members are actively building dashboards and applications that track governance statistics. Without further context clarifying the unique scope, differences, or advantages of this “advanced governance” coverage, we remain unconvinced that additional funding for this case is justified.

💬 Open Communication Channel

For further discussion and detailed feedback, please reply to this comment.

This feedback represents the collective voice of REEEEEEEEEE DAO members participating in Polkadot governance.