Correction Notice: Proposal Submitted in Error – Kindly Vote Nay
Dear community,
We sincerely apologize for this mistake. The Beneficiary account in this proposal was listed incorrectly. To protect project funds, a new proposal has been submitted with a multi-signature Beneficiary account.
This proposal is invalid. We kindly ask for your support by voting “Nay” here and instead supporting the new proposal:
👉 https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1727
We are truly sorry for the inconvenience and deeply grateful for your understanding and support.
Thank you all for your votes and support — it means a lot to us.
Your votes and trust give us the confidence to keep improving this project ❤️
Best,
Subscan Team
Comments (6)
Comments are restricted to accounts with an on-chain verified identity.
Requested
Proposal Failed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (18)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (41)0.0 DOT
Saxemberg has voted AYE on the Polkadot referendum 1723 Subscan Q4 2024 – Q2 2025 Funding Proposal: Basic Service Fee & Development Cost for the Polkadot and Westend Ecosystems. Core infrastructure is heavily supported.
This referendum is eligible for vote overrule:
https://voting.opensquare.io/space/the-sax-guild/proposal/QmfTDhvhqFUk6EL7viLQq74cBjFuuB1jXcQ1z4uFWAgYfN
@SAXEMBERG
Thank you very much for your support and kind words for Subscan. We truly appreciate your trust and recognition of our work.
However, we must sincerely apologize — this proposal was submitted in error with an incorrect Beneficiary account. To protect project funds, we have submitted a corrected proposal with a multi-signature Beneficiary account.
We kindly ask for your understanding and support by voting Nay on this proposal and instead supporting the new one:
👉 https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1727
We are very sorry for the inconvenience and deeply grateful for your continued trust.
Sincerely,
Subscan Team
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum (at least 4 aye votes) and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received four aye and zero nay votes from eight available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate
📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate
@PERMANENCE DAO
We are truly grateful for your thoughtful review and strong support of Subscan. Your recognition of our role in the ecosystem means a great deal to us.
Unfortunately, we must apologize — this proposal was submitted in error with an incorrect Beneficiary account. For the security of project funds, we have submitted a corrected proposal with a multi-signature Beneficiary account.
We kindly ask for your help by voting Nay on this proposal and instead supporting the corrected one:
👉 https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1727
We are very sorry for the trouble and sincerely appreciate your understanding, patience, and continued support.
With gratitude,
Subscan Team