Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more
Statescan maintenance proposal from 2023.10 to 2025.03
Statescan is an explorer solution for substrate based chains. We have been serving polkadot/kusama and related chains since 2021. Compared to explorers like subscan, it provides a 100% open source and low cost candidate for ecosystem projects.
Besides polkadot system chains, followings chains has adopted statescan as their explores: Hyperbridge(Nexus, gargantua), Heima(Litentry), Invarch, Polimec, Laos,, Crust, Shadow, Tangle, Tanssi testnet, Argon. There are also projects who deployed statescan by theirselves like Subsocial and Edgeware.
Infrastructure
| Items | Details | per month | Months | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Servers | 8 servers + 1.3TB volume | €157.12 | 18 | €2828 |
| Domain | 1 io domain | - | 18 | $89.78 |
| Total | - | 18 | $3051 |
Maintenance
The maintenance work mainly includes:
- Server deployment maintenance: daily server monitor, upgrading products versions, emergency handling, etc.
- Codebase maintenance: code refactor, bug fixes, UI tweaks, dependency upgrading, etc.
Please check the changelog and commits for more details. We will request 5 FTE days equivalent work per month.
Common features development
| Item | Workload | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Support EVM transactions indexing and fronted page, check issue #974 | 1 FTE * 1 week, 40 hrs | $3,200 |
| More system chains support, check issue #987 | 1 FTE * 1 week, 40 hrs | $3,200 |
| Total | 80 hrs | $6,400 |
Total cost
| Item | Workload | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructures | servers and domains | $3051 |
| Maintenance | Code refactor, UI tweaks and polish, bug fixes, etc; | 57,600 |
| Common features development | Please check the development section | $6,400 |
| Total | - | 67,051 |
Comments (4)
Requested
Proposal Passed
just for a better understanding.. howdoes work the coordination to solve issues, mantain and support for this kind of OS projects? i can to see like in the year 9 issues has been solved
@TheMvp07 Sorry for late reply. Sometimes we just had meetings and didn't create issues on github for some problems. You can check the commit history for our work.
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of all voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received six aye and zero nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO