[Small Spender] Reimburse accounts affected by an XCM bug
The three accounts on this proposal made extrinsics in the past that lost funds due to bugs in the runtime at that time.
The extrinsics were: 1, 2 and 3.
You can see that each shows that it failed, however, there should be a polkadotXcm.AssetsTrapped event too. This was due to a bug that the assets were not trapped and therefore lost. This bug was present in the version used in these extrinsics and is already fixed.
Since these funds were lost due to a bug, they should be reimbursed, while extrinsics where assets were trapped can be reclaimed, so they are not included in this proposal.
There was already a proposal for the same bug on Kusama.
Comments (4)
Requested
Proposal Failed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (61)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (19)0.0 DOT
Kus DAO Votes NAY.
✅ Proposal reimburses funds lost due to a runtime bug, aligning with Kusama’s precedent.
❌ Critics argue treasury should use DED tokens, not DOT, and question the validity of some claims.
💪 Get involved: 🔗 Discord Invite
💬 Join the discussion: 🔗 Discussion Thread
~@Pieky
Lucky Friday have voted AYE. Please consider this a temporary notification after our vote has gone on chain. If you would like additional feedback on our rationale for this vote, please join our OpenGov Public Forum on Telegram here: https://t.me/+559tyPSfmGg0NzUx
Lucky Friday provides feedback once per week (Fridays) if specifically requested in our OpenGov Public Forum, and we respectfully ask that all proponents of referenda interact with us here for the sake of transparency. Please tag our Director of Protocol Relations “Phunky” with your referendum number so that he can gather the relevant commentary from our internal deliberations.